Field survey · submission

Suggest a case study

Someone actually building, running, or trialling generative AI to do something concrete — not a policy, framework, guidance document, or untested proposal. Submissions go to the maintainer for review before they appear in the catalog.

← Back to the catalog
What counts here "We should use AI for X" doesn't qualify; "I used ChatGPT to do X, here's what happened" does. For "Reducing AI use" specifically: the strategy has to change the task or the incentive — after-the-fact AI-detection or plagiarism-flagging tools don't qualify, evidenced or not. Detector scores are opaque and can falsely flag students who did nothing wrong (example), so they aren't treated as sound evidence either.
Before you submit — please confirm

Know of a whole repository of case studies?

If you know of a page, PDF, or collection with several case studies rather than just one, send the link instead — the maintainer will go through it and add what qualifies.